Sequrin can help with
- Finding unusual activity worth a closer look
- Showing relevant relationships across claims and entities
- Keeping evidence, context and case history together
- Giving investigators a clearer starting point
Approach
We keep analytical detection and consequential claims decisions apart on purpose. Data becomes context, analysis becomes a lead, investigators build the evidence and the people accountable for the outcome are the ones who decide it.
The workflow
Bring the claims and reference data you actually need into an analytical context scoped to the organisation doing the work.
Rules, statistics, models and relationship analysis surface activity worth a second look. Different methods can contribute evidence without becoming the decision-maker.
Authorised investigators review the claims, connected entities, timeline, relationships and supporting evidence instead of reconstructing the story from scattered alerts.
Whatever the investigation concludes goes through the organisation's own accountable process. Sequrin can support the work, but it does not make the consequential decision.
Start with evidence
A sensible evaluation starts with a specific claims-integrity question, the data needed to test it and a clear view of who can access the work.
Then measure what investigators actually care about: whether the signal was relevant, whether the connected context helped, how much noise came with it and whether the workflow made the review easier.
Where the line sits
Sequrin can help with
A person still has to
For medical schemes
The question is not whether the demo looks good. It is whether Sequrin gives your investigators better context and a more useful way to work.